All posts by whitekitten

The necessity of modern life

Language policy in Kazakhstan is one of the most important areas of the educational system. Kazakhstan as a democratic state encourages every citizen to acquire three languages: Kazakh, Russian and English (Law on languages, 1997). The knowledge of these languages could broaden the abilities of every citizen and enforce the trilingual educational policy development.

Comparing the goals of Kazakhstani and European educational policies, it could be assumed that the purposes are similar: to speak at least two languages in addition to the native language. The number of various nationalities in Kazakhstan is more than 140 and the number of immigrants in Europe gradually grows, so the plurilingual education is a necessity of modern life. According to Fierman (1997), the population of Kazakhstan in 1989 by ethnic groups was very different from what we can see now. The population of Kazakhs was 27, 1%, while the number of Russians was 50, 8%. Because of the Russian domination, people were fluent in the Russian language. Therefore, as a result, the status of the Kazakh language was considerably low. According to the data from “Ethnologie“ the number of commonly used languages in Kazakhstan is 14 and due to the diversity of nationalities and multicultural situation we live in, multilingual education is a beneficial and valuable strategy politically as well as demographically. Analyzing “The strategy for developing and functioning of languages for 2011-2020”, Kazakhstan has created an effective system of supporting the different ethnics living in Kazakhstan (about 1524- Russian schools, 58 –Uzbek, 14- Uighur, 2- Tadjik etc.). About 190 ethnic cultural organizations support the native languages of 30 nationalities. Furthermore, the country has various ethnic theaters: 1 –Korean, 1-German, 1-Uigur, and Uzbek in addition to 50 Kazakh theaters.

The country has developed 8 trilingual dictionaries with a total circulation of 260,000 copies. In spite of the fact that we are a multicultural country, one of the major priorities of the strategy is to acquire the state language and expand its usage. The second target of the strategy is to increase the level of culture of the Kazakhstani society. In addition, we can complement the drivers of pluralism in Kazakhstan by increasing the cooperation with the culture of different countries, involving e the cultural events. For example: culture day, documentary films with the use of original languages. The professional development of teachers is the most important part of the strategy. The country aims to implement a set of practical measures in order to apply new standards, technologies and methodologies in language teaching, and in order to give an opportunity to encourage the society to speak Kazakh and preserve the linguistic diversity of the country.

So, why do we have to do in order to keep the linguistic variety in Kazakhstan?

First, there is a strong need to give an access to high-quality education for all citizens, as it shows the democracy in the country and the tolerant attitude towards the representatives of minority language groups. The portfolio proffered by European policy makers could become a great tool in identifying the linguistic abilities of students, applying and developing new methods in language teaching for citizens around the world. Considering minority language representatives the important point is to include their “native” languages in order to create an effective environment for them to become confident and responsible members of society. Thus, it will lead to economic development, social and political stability in the country.

Secondly, the preservation of minority languages is important in order to create a democratic society, where every citizen has linguistic human rights. Also, the minority languages could help students acquire a foreign language as well and help preserve the identity of students. European policy makers as well as Kazakhstani aim to create plurilingual societies, so some measures should be taken: improvement of teaching methodologies and approaches, development of new textbooks and materials for students, curriculum and assessment enhancement. There is a valuable reason to save rare and minor languages because each language has its own heritage and knowledge; furthermore, the languages pass on the cultures and the traditions of the ethnic group.

So, the immigration of different nations is a new opportunity , for native citizens as well as for newcomers. The strategy proclaimed by European Policy makers could be applied here in Kazakhstan, as the situation with immigrants is quite similar. One of the most important part of the policy is the promotion of multiculturalism in order to broaden the competitiveness of people around the world, which has no chance to exist without the knowledge of languages.

What do you think about plurilingualism? How can we preserve the linguistic variety in Kazakhstan?

References:

Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL—A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1200-1214). Springer US.

Cavalli, M., Coste, D., Crişan, A., & van de Ven, P. H. (2009). Plurilingual and intercultural education as a project. Language Policy Division. Retrieved from: http://www. coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/LE_texts_Source/EducPlurInter-Projet_en. pdf.(May, 20th).

Martyniuk, W. (2011). In support of plurilingual people living in multilingual societies: Policies and frameworks of European language education. OLBI Working Papers, 2.

Fierman, W. (2006). Language and Education in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan: Kazakh-Medium Instruction in Urban Schools. Russian Review, 65 (1), pp. 98-116.

Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2011). The Development and Functioning of Languages in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2011-2020.

Advertisements

The struggle with an ideology…

nydailynews.com

Is this and this not a provocation, guys?

The spread of terrorist acts significantly changed the lives of people and the perception of Islamic religion around the world. To the continuation of the classroom discourse about the accident on 7 of January I would like to provide the prehistory of the terrible events in Paris.
Charlie Hebdo – is a satirical magazine mocking politicians, religion and famous people very often of the obscene character. First impingement was in 2011, when the caricaturists published Muhammad prophet naked, causing the act of the office bombing and the Charlie Hebdo website hacking. After the distribution of the film “Innocence of Muslims” French journalists supported the anti- Islamist video publishing negative and even offensive utterances about the prophet and were assaulted. In the course of attacks 12 people including two policemen were killed.
Our Professor asked us to analyze whether the events in Paris somehow connected with the ideology of linguistic purity. According to Weber & Horner (2012), the ideology of purity declares that people have a belief that the only one norm or reality exists and diversity of different views on life should be eradicated. The ideology of purism could provoke racial disturbances, wars; terrorist attacks on the account of religion. Salman Rushdie (2003), states that “those who embrace difference are in danger from the apostles of purity” (as cited in Weber & Horner, 2012, p. 21). The ideology of the purity might evoke the struggle for the power, and that way it could become a real social as well as political danger for human beings. Langer and Davies (2005), mentioned about the emotional factors that drive the influential members of society to perceive things in accordance with their own beliefs and values (as cited in Weber & Horner, 2012, p. 20).
There is a harsh critique in the society. On the one hand people believe that the murders upheld the name of the Prophet because the pictures hurt feelings of all the religious people. However it is refuted by those who argue for the freedom of expression and accept those pictures as a joke.
The linguistic purity here means not the preservation, revitalization or standardization of the language but the way the caricaturists metaphorically showed harsh criticism and censorial pictures of the Islamic prophet which you can see above. Terrorists might hold the idea of purity and did not accept that derision of the Saint. This gives me better understanding of the necessity to pay attention to the education as one of the most important sphere of human future life. If we, future leaders in education, claim to bring up a generation which will be tolerant, democratic and intelligent. How can we attack the roots of religious discrimination? As for me, there is a great need now not to develop the extra abilities, but to start from the very beginning is to bring up a kind-hearted individual who will be abide by the humane rules, will not abandon himself to despair and will think with his own head. Consequently, the terror act was an example of the one-sided life perception that caused such irreversible consequences taken away lots of human lives.
What do you think about this act? What side are you for? Do you think that the ideology of purity could lead to such kind of terrorist acts? Does this act shows that we should start implement teaching subject “religion” at schools? So, is it an ideology or another reason for that kind of action?

References:
Weber, J-J. & Horner, K. (2012). Introducing multilingualism: A social approach. Abingdon: Routledge.