YOU ARE WRONG! Or are you? (Sometimes you need to let others decide)

This is a challenging time for the second-year students because it is the most important period, which allows us to demonstrate the outcomes of our experience in GSE in the form of a tangible manifestation of our learning via our thesis. This thought adds mental pressure on the perfectionism within some of us, causing us to go into the “better nothing, than subpar” thinking.
One of the ways I have found helpful in overcoming this state of mind is to improve the parts of the thesis written prior. But when you look at a text written by you for a long time, it is already so familiar that you may get stuck and not see any ideas for improvement.
And here a fresh viewpoint can be introduced in the form of feedback from peers to stir up the calm waters and raise new and surprising ideas and concerns about your writing. It is a great way have something you have written evaluated without the pressure of submitting it for marks. But for peer feedback to be actually useful, there is a need for some consideration into how you react to criticism and whether you would be able to actually utilize those suggestions.

In my experience, previously I was really defensive when receiving feedback, especially from peers. But now, with a lot of exercises in our Thesis Writing class devoted to the process of reviewing, I am on the way to reaching the mindset where I will value each piece of feedback as a valuable contribution and learn to differentiate between when to follow advice, and when to leave what was written as is.

My main suggestion is to keep your mind open, ask questions about feedback to understand it better and make the process of peer reviewing easier for all the parties involved.

(Make others work to make your thesis better)

Картинки по запросу think about it

1 thought on “YOU ARE WRONG! Or are you? (Sometimes you need to let others decide)

  1. Thanks for sharing, Soothsayer.
    I know I’m biased, but I think the activities you have been doing should raise these exact issues. In this post you focus some on the mindset that is needed to value, accept, evaluate, and accept (or politely decline) peer feedback, but I have a couple questions that you didn’t address fully enough for me: 1) What is needed to foster our ability to “stir up the calm waters”, as you so aptly put it? Aren’t we generally more inclined to (using two more watercraft metaphors) “not rock the boat” or “not make waves”? 2) What is needed to “differentiate between when to follow advice, and when to leave what was written as is”? How can you tell the difference between good advice and its not-so-helpful counterpart? Food for thought that you might address in future posts. Also, please cite all images you use.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s