Data collection experience

For the first time, I experienced conducting an interview for research purposes in the first year of studying at Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education. During the fall session, our Inquiry Methods course professors gave us a group assignment that consisted of two parts: quantitative and qualitative. The qualitative part of that small-scale research focused on exploring challenges faced by NU undergraduate students during their first year at university and strategies they used for coping with those challenges. With the rest of the group, we created questions for the interviews and “went to the field to collect data”. It was not difficult to find participants for our mini-research since the NU atrium is always full with students. Each of the group members was supposed to conduct two interviews. As I remember, the whole process took me of about an hour and a half, and in the end, I had two interviews recorded on my phone. Later, with my groupmates we went through all the steps of data analysis and succeeded in drawing conclusions based on our findings. That experience was very useful and helpful in terms of guiding me further in working on other assignments, especially, on my real thesis.

For exploring the perceptions of 2nd year NUGSE students about using blogging in academic writing in a foreign language I also decided to follow the qualitative approach and use an interview as an instrument. Based on the previous experience, I can say that interviews are a great tool of receiving in-depth information about a particular phenomenon. However, this instrument of data collection has its own weaknesses as well. It is obvious that interviewing is quite a time-consuming process, which cannot be conducted spontaneously at any place. The place for the interview should be quiet and convenient for the interviewee in order for the researcher to obtain enough information. To be honest, collecting data for the mini-research this time was much more challenging even in terms of recruiting the participants. All my groupmates were too busy working on their assignments, therefore, it was a little problematic to find time and place convenient for them. Fortunately, two of my groupmates agreed to participate in the short (5 questions) interview, and I was able to record their answers on my phone. I was lucky because both participants had experience in blogging and gave in-depth and extended answers.

I have become more experienced in conducting interviews while working on the mini-thesis this time. In my proposed thesis research project, I am also using qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews. Of course, the interviews for the real thesis will contain more questions, and therefore, more time will be spent on the process. I am also thinking of creating some follow-up and directing questions in case I end up having interviewees who are not very eager to provide extended answers or lose focus easily.

4 thoughts on “Data collection experience

  1. Hi Dayana!

    Comparing your experience of conducting interviews being a first and second-year student, can you see some improvement in your skills as an interviewer? Do you think articles about teachniques and tips on how to interview people are helpful? And if you are asked to share, how many tips would you give to a person who is doing it for the first time?

    As for your writing, I like the logical structure of the blog and use of linking words.

    Like

  2. Dear Dayana!
    I see that all of us are experiencing the same challenges while collecting data for the research. From the posts I can conclude that most of us have chosen a qualitative research design for online education and therefore, common instrument is an interview.
    Do you think that we need to have a separate practical task on how to compile open-ended questions for the research? Because I see that we all face problems with that.

    Like

  3. Dear Dayana, Gulnara and Miramgul,

    I cannot but agree with you that we need more practice in conducting both interviews and surveys as now, having faced the real boots-on-the-ground responsilities while conducting mini interviews and surveys, we have encountered so many nonconformancies that stems from lack of practical experience. I guess the reason lies in having really intensive courses of Inquiry Methods where we were literally running a race agaist time.

    As for growing as a researcher, I can happily admit that I can see some improvements in my skills, so do others, I guess. I have recently shared my experience with others about Cresswell textbook and they were laughing because they actually noticed the same changes)) . I noticed the difference between reading that book last year and this year, and I can say that I feel “lightbulb moment” while opening and reading this book now)).

    I believe, this experience will help us to bridge this gap between textbook and practice, and we go to real fields fully equipped and knowledgable.

    Wish you good luck and patience in your thesis writing.

    Kind regards, Aliya

    Like

  4. Dayana,

    Great application of previous knowledge and practice to this assignment. This is not a skill we should take for granted. It will certainly serve you well in your future research.

    Your writing is well organized, shows some original ideas, and is free of grammatical mistakes. Well done!

    5/5

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s