Literature review and some strategies.

When I think about two words “literature review” the first, which comes to my mind, is the electronic library and a pile of different printed articles.

For me, literature review was the most challenging part when I worked on my proposal paper last year. The first difficulty was with credible and reliable resources. I spent a lot of time trying to use different key words in order to find articles, which somehow will relate to my topic. The second challenge was trying to identify the research gap. When I started to study articles in order to reveal the area, which had not been studied before, I thought that it is impossible to find this gap. The last challenge was to combine all articles together, so that there will not be just the description of each separated article, but the well-constructed text.

However, our instructors’ recommendations made the process of writing literature review not so challenging. First, they suggested us to use the table and fill in it with articles, which we have already studied. I think that this table was a good strategy for me and for the majority of my group mates. As for me, I did not spend my time trying to return to the article, which described the importance of collaboration, for example; I had everything in my table. Second, as the majority of us had a problem with the research gap, they advised us to try to find researches done on our topic in Kazakhstan. If the topic has not been studied within Kazakhstani context, this also can be considered as a research gap. And the last, regarding credible resources they recommended us to find, for example one article and go to the list of references, skim this list choosing articles, which relate to our topic and can be used in our papers. This approach of finding articles saved a lot of time, which I devoted to the detailed study of researches.

I am using all these suggested strategies now and I hope that my literature review part will be successful.

2 thoughts on “Literature review and some strategies.

  1. Dear Aizhan,

    I found the strategies that you applied during the past semester useful and meaningful. I have the similar struggles during my writing of the paper as well.

    However, I have practical questions: how do you organize the table? Which headings do you use? and how do you tranfer the table into a mindmap for identifying the research gap?

    Like

  2. Thanks Aizhan, you do a nice job giving an overview of your research process. It looks like you still have a bit of work to do until you know exactly how you will organize and construct the lit review in your thesis.

    Your writing is overall clear and direct, but I did notice one recurring issue with comma usage with “which” phrases.

    1) When I think about two words “literature review” the first, which comes to my mind, is the electronic library and a pile of different printed articles.

    2) When I started to study articles in order to reveal the area, which had not been studied before, I thought that it is impossible to find this gap.

    See points 3 and 4 at https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/607/02/ to see examples and then post your revised versions below.

    4.5/5

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s